Hot damn.
Well this is how its supposed to happen at least, the first on is on Thursday, when my group will do the topic of Bilingual education.
The Bill we are debating is 'Banning all bilingual education in Wisconsin, and using structured Enlish immersion programs for bilingual kids.'
Naturally when my group got together we discussed our personal views on the matter, and we all were against the bill- we all support bilingual education.
We needed to split the group in half and research both sides of the debate, and have half the group ready to defend the bill.
Why not me? So I go into the research part of it with the mind set of...In order to do my part of the assignment, I have to convince myself that Bilingual is a bad policy- only then will I be able to possibly convince other people in the room who had originally been for bilingual ed.
After four group meetings, guess who's not so convinced anymore!
Forcing myself to really look into the other side of the debate was probably the best thing I could have done.
I'm not going to say that I'm for Banning ALL bilingual ed- but I most definitely am for placing a higher bar on bilingual programs in terms of which schools are allowed to implement it or not.
More often than not, its an extremely idealistic policy that leaves kids behind, and without being dominant in Spanish OR English.
Can you imagine?




