Another successfully run, LC retreat has come to an end- and some interesting things went down and many of the mixed feelings I had after the first GMM of the semester have faded when I saw what our LC has morphed into. There was high energy, engaged members (especially new members), and a lot of people were taking ownership in sessions that were lasting...mm i think one hit 5 hours? I was especially impressed with the, what i thought to be, high level of critical thinking by members in matters that i know i wasn't able to speak knowledgeably about after only one semester in aiesec. I think this is a testament to how our LC has considerably increased the integration of newer members in the past 3 years with regards to both decision making of the LC and with simply the thought of our structure and strategies.
With this, I was also extremely surprised to be faced with what i felt to be a divided LC on our future vision on what we are actually working for our LC to look like. I left the group in May thinking we all were ready to tackle a major goal of committing to growth, sustainable healthy growth, of the size of our membership while maintaining and ensuring the quality of the experience and our members. To me, a proposal of recruiting a number that would lead to an actually shrinking of the LC- a shared proposal by more than one at the retreat- seems to be two steps in the wrong direction, and gives very mixed messages to newer members on how we actually plan on carrying out our mission.
Member integration seemed to be the deciding factor for many people on why we can't increase the number of people we are bringing in. With only 4 our of 55 new members dropping out last semester, and the fact that the remainder of our new recruits were in this room having strategy conversations one semester later, shows an integration and vested interest of members in the LC. Also, with almost the entire room willing and wanting to be a buddy next semester- to me it seems that our LC is sitting at an awesome and exciting place right now ready and able to move forward- not backward, and not stand still to wait for something to happen in the future.
So what is holding people back? The discussion then moved to the lack of 'work' for members to do and the functionality (or lack there of) of the LC :The higher the number, the less work for people to do and the ability of the LC to function decreases. To me, this should not be seen as a problem, but rather the exciting part~ an LC of 85 strong and motivated members to figure out how we can arrange our organization to function with 125, 150, 175, 200+ people. To a group that prides itself on innovation, I would think this (awesome) problem would be taken on as the next challenge we should come together and overcome and power through together.
We preach to our peers to break down barriers and comfort zones and to experience things you never thought you could handle before. We go to countries and live in places that most of our friends and family think we are crazy for doing, but when it comes to the home front, I'm very disappointed to see this powerful message has become only words. If we do not push ourselves to imagine ourselves as an organization making strides forward at all times- what are we doing? I don't think we can pride ourselves as being innovative and actually wanting to work towards our mission if we close ourselves into a box of thought to imagine AIESEC in only the way you have come to love it. We can keep what we love and also move forward towards the overall Dream- If only we come together and be willing to figure out how to tangibly Do It.